Dion Hinchcliffe's Web 2.0 Blog
Web 2.0 University

Blog Feed

Subscribe By E-Mail

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



Web 2.0 Expo San Francisco 2008 Speaker

Enterprise 2.0 Conference 2008 Speaker

Web 2.0 Strategies 2008 Speaker
Dion Hinchcliffe on Twitter

    Dion's Facebook Status

    Recent Readers

    Web 2.0 Ajax SOA Power Panel

    Web 2.0, Ajax and SOA Power Panel with Dion Hinchcliffe and Jeremy Geelan
    Click above to watch a SYS-CON Power Panel discussion on Web 2.0, Ajax, and SOA with Dion Hinchcliffe, Jeremy Geelan, and other industry notables including SOA Web Services Journal Editor-in-Chief, Sean Rhody. Taped on Dec 7th, 2005 from the Reuter's TV studio in Times Square.

     

    Public Calendar

    Microsoft Gets Disrupted

    posted Wednesday, 9 November 2005

    I assume you saw the headlines light up across mainstream media and the industry press today about Microsoft’s leaked memos on the Internet services table turnover. (Heck, as a I write this, I am hearing the source of all this, Dave Winer, get interviewed on NPR about the details.)

    Bill Gates wrote a good one though surprisingly half-hearted but Ray Ozzie, Microsoft’s CTO, wrote the best.  

    His panoramic, internal summary of Microsoft’s precarious position is both electrifying and poetic:

    Ray Ozzie's Services Disruption Memo Oct. 9th, 2005

    Despite Ozzie’s amazingly written treatise though, MS evangelist Robert Scoble is the one that captured the real problems that are rotting Microsoft’s business model (and many other vendor’s) from inside:

    Scobleizer - Microsoft Geek Blogger » Ross doesn’t trust Microsoft’s approach to Web

    This new, rapidly emerging vision of the Web, with Web 2.0, Software As A Service, and Web As Platform has just run a potentially fatal stake through Microsoft’s heart, and to a lesser extent of IBM, Oracle, and other traditional software businesses.


    The ultimate fallout of all this is certainly unclear at the moment. Read the coverage closely along with everyone else and see if you can figure out -- with the rest of us -- where things are actually heading.

    And I know some of you don’t believe, maybe even think these guys are wrong. But the stakes are high, and if you calculate poorly, then your business, and your customers and employees may be the ones that pay.

    Just remember that giants fall hard and fall slow. Windows will remain on the desktop, but Microsoft’s growth and relevance is probably permanently disrupted.

    The upshot: The shift to the centrality of software on the Web is faster and more significant than most of us thought. 

    So important  things are afoot along with big questions:

    • Can you leverage this?

    • Do you align with this?

    • Or do you shrug, and find it irrelevant to your current lines of business?

    I don’t think you can do the latter any longer and really matter.

    Update: Robert Scoble, official Microsoft technical evangelist extraordinaire, had a few nice comments on this post yesterday.

    Technorati: web2.0, microsoft

    links: del.icio.us    



    AddThis Social Bookmark Button

    1. Antipants left...
    Wednesday, 9 November 2005 11:07 pm

    Notice that each of the applications you've identified as part of this new centrality are effectively recreational apps popular with the blogo., but hardly aligned with the concerns of the corporate world.

    Maybe OS X ISVs are the one's who should really be wetting themselves, if the echo chamber is to be believed.


    2. phil jones left...
    Thursday, 10 November 2005 12:49 am

    I think it's important to say why these new web-services are disruptive. They allow new, small companies to produce products that compete with Microsoft's, but MS can't retaliate without canibalizing their own packaged software market.

    I think MS's capacity to survive, and stay as the incumbent depends very much on how it handles the problem of development tools. The foundation of Microsoft's success is its commitment to programming languages and IDEs (which support its platforms and push developers towards whatever future MS plans)

    To stay incumbent, MS need to keep their developers' tools in control. But the nature of web 2.0 is peer-production (ie. free / open source software). The web-as-service is going to be driven by Rails, PHP (and Ning), Drupal, (possibly Zope if it can get its act together) etc. How does MS engage with this? It can't cede control to these rivals, so it has to keep its tools up-to-date. But increasingly development tools will be social, allowing sharing of code snippets, source-search across thousands of open projects etc. MS will need to learn to play in this open world, to stay in the web-as-service game.

    More :

    http://platformwars.blogspot.com/2005/11/service-wave.html


    3. solomon_rex left...
    Thursday, 10 November 2005 12:41 pm

    At first, everything stays small, is recreational and doesn't matter. Like cell phones, GUIs and personal computing itself. Eventually, the tech will reach the corporate world because it makes sense.

    I'm reminded of the tiddly-wiki, which is a simple, editable website with interactive layout and which is just a single file that your browser can access, usually locally. It's not good tech, and you can't roll it out at a large company to change the world. But it's an AJAX-type thing that completely avoids reliance on Office, Windows and even programmers (though of course it doesn't exist without a development community to invent it and make updates). To me, this indicates that AJAX is a real competitor: a free, standards-compliant, development platform that offers a marked advantage. A wiki does better at tracking changes than Microsoft Word. And while Microsoft can reinvent the wiki, then can't charge for it. That's why they need subscription style services now.


    4. Kip Meacham left...
    Thursday, 10 November 2005 1:20 pm :: http://rsspundit.blogspot.com

    <A HREF="http://rsspundit.blogspot.com/2005/11/turn-ship-around-gatesozz ie-memos-and.html">I believe</A> the battle for this space is going to be a bloodbath with many companies being eaten or dying. While I would NEVER underestimate Microsoft, I think it will face some MAJOR culture shock responding to these memos. If the 'corporate cultural arteries' are too hard, a massive stroke and ultimately a long, painful death may be the result.

    Kip Meacham


    5. Michael McDerment left...
    Friday, 11 November 2005 12:23 pm :: http://www.michaelmcderment.com/

    Microsoft needs to lead the way in API innovation that makes HUGE DATA (like the satelite images used in Google Maps) more accessible. Nothing new with that, and your “Amazon Understands the Long Tail” post is a great example of how Amazon is working on this.

    Why is HUGE DATA more important than ever? Because of the long tail of markets AND SERVICES. The low end of the market is going to be really cluttered as countless apps compete at the low end of the market for users who want things that "just work" - as Ray Ozzie points out in his email. Writely, Basecamp and 2ndSite are all examples of this. I've written more about this clutter here:

    http://www.michaelmcderment.com/article/Web2ChroniclesVolumeOne.html

    (about halfway down)

    I’d say the "big guys" like Microsoft need to play the role of HUB for HUGE DATA that the little guys can't afford to access/complile/gather/etc. Presently, Amazon and Google and EBay do this very well. Salesforce is working on it in their own way. I’d say Microsoft is falling behind.

    If I was at Microsoft worrying about strategy, I'd be thinking about HUGE DATA and how to free it, not developing many little web services and trying to repeat my past success with the same old offerings that worked before. I’d focus immediately on huge data first and foremost because Microsoft will have plenty of time to achieve significant market share for the many “just work” services – even two years out...the real opportunity seems to be in HUGE DATA. That’s the one Microsoft does not want to fall behind on…


    6. tomek left...
    Friday, 2 March 2007 9:50 am :: http://www.profesjonalna-reklama.pl

    Thanks for very interesting article.